Question -
Dear Spaceman,
I have wondered about the 'alien' propulsion system that Bob Lazar described using 3 anti-gravity amplifiers to control 'space' craft flight and warp space-time. Does your expertise in delta gravity have anything to do with that subject and if not, does Bob's information hold up to scrutiny? When do you believe that we will conquer gravity and space time? Is there really an element around 114 or 115 that defies or can be considered as anti-gravity?
I am 52 years old and have been fascinated with the idea of where humankind will be technologically in the future.
Answer -
Hello again Derek!
Thanks for your questions.
Q. I have wondered about the 'alien' propulsion system that Bob Lazar described using 3 antigravity amplifiers to control 'space' craft flight and warp space-time.
A. Yes, this is a very advanced system which can indeed control and generate gravity fields. There is not much need for the "space-time warp" sort of thinking. This system simply generates a harmonic field in the Terahertz range that manipulates gravity waves. One can accomplish much with this sort of technology alone!
Does your expertise in delta gravity have anything to do with that subject and if not, does Bob's information hold up to scrutiny?
A. Sure and yes... There are three main ways to generate a field which can overcome the ambient G field of our Earth and in some cases, free space.
1. Jamming: Our local G field is canceled with an inverse frequency set which cancels its effect. This works just like noise canceling headphones. There is a subset of ways to do this.
2. A strong magnetic field can be generated which allows a craft to float using Earths magnetic field as a counterpoint. This is like the "Waverider" scout craft which crashed in Roswell back in 1947.
3. On board gravity wave generation (as in the Lazar system) which works the best, but is much more difficult to implement.
Note: Lazar knows more that anyone would if they were simply trying to propagate a simple hoax. You can even view his S-4 work site using TerraServer satellite imagery. It appears as a mountain side facility just about 7 miles south of the Area 51 main runway. You can see the S-4 "parking lot" next to nothing more than a simple mountain ridge!
When do you believe that we will conquer gravity and space time? Is there really an element around 114 or 115 that defies or can be considered as antigravity?
A. It may take some time for the general science community to understand the principals involved since this topic is regarded as secret military intelligence. Much is know already by a very few. Yes, heavy elements like 115 have been verified for some years now in the science community.
Let me know if you need any details...
My Best Wishes,
Spaceman
***** new questions *****
Dear Spaceman,
Do you happen to know what cause the Waverider to crash in 1947?
Do you know if there are any commercially available electronic equipment that can measure magnetic field(s) in real-time? What would be needed to capture and down-covert these signals for viewing/measuring via a scope? I am familiar with delta modulation (down-conversion sampling) techniques if that helps.
Best regards,
Derek
Get the answer below
Sponsored Links
Answer
More info for Derek...
Do you happen to know what cause the Waverider to crash in 1947?
A. There are many who think that the high-power radar systems used nearby may have disrupted their craft's field integrity.
There are some clues here Derek on how to implement an easier method to reduce ambient G fields by disruption as opposed to the very difficult self-generated G-field method.
Do you know if there are any commercially available electronic equipment that can measure magnetic field(s) in real-time? (No)
A. I used near-field probes (which I made myself) in our lab. These were connected to HP spectrum analyzers. Note we did not use these for G field measurements, but this was the main way such fields were measured in the past. We were working on more simple superconductor ring-resonance field methods and were looking for other frequency harmonics.
What would be needed to capture and down-covert these signals for viewing/measuring via a scope? I am familiar with delta modulation (down-conversion sampling) techniques if that helps.
A. Yes, it helps to know such things. See the previous answer.
We used the term "delta" to simply indicate any relative change from 1G.
Please also review: www.smthop.com/wellplayed/viewpage.asp?LinkID=178 ... This site relates how hard the self-genration technology really is.
Cheers,
Spaceman
No comments:
Post a Comment